ANTHROPOLOGIE STRUCTURALE LEVI STRAUSS PDF

Anthropologie Structurale [C Levi-Strauss] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. This reissue of a classic will reintroduce readers to Lévi-Strauss’s understanding of man and society in terms of individuals—kinship, social organization, religion. Get this from a library! Anthropologie structurale.. [Claude Lévi-Strauss].

Author: Kazragul Viramar
Country: Tajikistan
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Love
Published (Last): 12 August 2009
Pages: 236
PDF File Size: 2.53 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.79 Mb
ISBN: 584-8-38605-404-8
Downloads: 81448
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dokus

Structural anthropology

Possibly the most significant influence on structuralism came from Mauss’ The Gift. While part of his analysis of the Kachin was simply based on incorrect ethnographic information, the rest reflected Kachin ideology but not actual practice. Exogamy promotes inter-group alliances and forms structures of social networks. Structuralism’s main propositions were not formulated in a way so that they could be subject to verification or falsification.

Elementary structures can operate based on two forms of exchange: Retrieved from ” https: According to Leach, in Kachin reality instabilities arose primarily from competition for bridewealth. In South America he showed that there are “dual organizations” throughout Amazon rainforest cultures, and that these “dual organizations” represent opposites and their synthesis. Structures are universal; their realization is culturally specific.

He found that the latter’s analysis of the Kachin contained serious flaws. Restricted exchange structures are generally quite uncommon. Just as speakers can talk without awareness of grammar, he argued, humans are unaware of the workings of social structures in daily life. However, matrilateral generalised exchange poses a risk as group A depends on receiving a woman from a group that it has not itself given a woman to, producing a less immediate obligation to reciprocate compared to a restricted exchange system.

Actor—network theory Alliance theory Cross-cultural studies Cultural materialism Culture theory Diffusionism Feminism Historical particularism Boasian anthropology Functionalism Interpretive Performance studies Political economy Practice theory Structuralism Post-structuralism Systems theory.

Prescribing exogamy creates a distinction between marriageable and tabooed women that necessitates a search for women outside one’s own kin group “marry out or die out” and fosters exchange relationships with other groups.

  EL CROQUIS ALVARO SIZA 140 PDF

Articles that may contain original research from March All articles that may contain original research Articles needing additional references from March All articles needing additional references Articles with multiple maintenance issues.

Descent theory and alliance theory therefore look at two sides of one coin: Views Read Edit View history. This article needs additional citations for verification. This article has multiple issues.

Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. For example, in the Amazon basin, two extended families would build their houses in two facing semicircles that together form a big circle.

Anthropologie structurale – Claude Lévi-Strauss – Google Books

This page was last edited on 14 Decemberat Continued restricted exchange means that the two lineages marry together. The structures that form the “deep grammar” of society originate in the mind and operate unconsciously albeit not in a Freudian sense. This article possibly contains original research.

These tribal societies are made up of multiple moieties that often split up, rendering them comparatively unstable. In reality, the system was strongly unbalanced with built-in status differences between wife-givers and wife-takers. And even if reciprocity was anthropooogie primary principle that underlies marriages, the return would not have to be in kind but could take other forms such as money, livestock, services or favours of various kinds.

Semi-complex structures strkcturale so many negative marriage rules that they effectively prescribe marriage to specific parties, thus somewhat resembling elementary structures. The marriage system was quite messy and the chance of it breaking down increased with the number of groups involved. Multiple researchers were educated in this school. Consequently, the last wife-taking group in the chain is significantly inferior to the first wife-giving group to which it is supposed to give its wives.

Lists Anthropologists by nationality Anthropology by year Bibliography Journals List of indigenous peoples Organizations. The second form of exchange within elementary structures is called generalised exchange, meaning that a man can only marry either his MBD matrilateral cross-cousin marriage or his FZD patrilateral cross-cousin marriage.

  BENDICIONAL CATLICO PDF

His model explained practices that were not observed. This approach, he felt, made for fresh new ideas. He called the three kinship structures elementary, semi-complex and complex.

Men sought to get the maximum profit in forms of either bridewealth or political advantage from their daughters’ marriage. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Social relationships are therefore based on exchange; Durkheimian solidarity, according to Mauss, is best achieved through structures of reciprocity and related systems of exchange.

Leach charged the latter with neglecting the effects of material conditions on social relations. Boyer pointed out that anthropklogie research on concepts in psychology have not supported a structuralistic view of concepts, but rather a theory-oriented or prototype-based view. He straues that in practice there would be competition for women, leading to accumulation and therefore asymmetries in the system.

March Learn how and when to remove this template message. The Yanomami fit very well into the alliance theory mold, while the Tallensi or Azande do not. African tribal societies employ descent as their primary organizational principle. Others, for example Godelier, critiqued structuralism’s synchronic approach that led it to be essentially ahistorical.

Mauss argued that gifts are not free, but rather oblige the recipient to reciprocate.

Learn how and when to remove these template messages. For them, social structures were primarily shaped by material conditions, property relations and class struggles. Archaeological Biological Cultural Linguistic Social.

Internal incoherence and a range of intrinsic limitations further reduced its appeal.